
LATEST SHOCKING REVEALS
IF THEY HIT YOU, HIT HARDER: LIFE LESSONS FROM DAD THAT TURNED JOTAM INTO A SOCIAL MEDIA WARRIOR
IT eksperten slår til igen. Saglig ekspert kilde for danske medier der dækker krigen i Mellemøsten. pic.twitter.com/mEVqrOWiok
— Jotam Confino (@mrconfino) September 26, 2024
Hej Jotam, du skal trække et nummer ved døren og så tager jeg fat om din sag når jeg er færdige med de andre 🙂
— Omar Marzouk (@OmarMarzouk) October 10, 2024
Tænker du har en meget dårlig sag her, det var dig som startede med at opføre dig injurierende over for mig ved at kalde mig for terrorsympatisør, hvorfor din sag… pic.twitter.com/JvyKOfSrh5
JOTAM CONFINO’S MASTERCLASS IN DODGING CRITICISM
HOW TO SILENCE CRITICS AND ALIENATE YOUR AUDIENCE
A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE BY JOTAM CONFINO
Watch and learn as Jotam Confino, the self-declared ‘expert’ on Middle Eastern affairs, demonstrates his unique approach to journalistic discourse—block first, ask questions never.
In a stunning display of professional acrobatics, Jotam Confino once again claims the title of ‘expert’ in his latest social media spectacle. His tweet proudly announces, “The IT expert strikes again. A credible expert source for Danish media covering the war in the Middle East.” Yet, when faced with even the slightest hint of criticism from Niels Brinch, our valiant ‘expert’ chooses the high road—blocking any chance of rebuttal.
ANALYSIS OF JOTAM CONFINO’S STRATEGY: LET’S DISSECT THE EXPERT TECHNIQUE HERE
STEP 1
Proclaim Yourself as an Expert: Make sure you remind everyone about your unmatched expertise, especially if it’s as verifiable as a mirage.
STEP 2
Block the Critics: Why waste time defending your position when you can simply hit the block button? Debate is so overrated, right?
STEP 3
Avoid Accountability: Nothing says ‘professional’ like avoiding all accountability. If they can’t respond, they can’t disagree.
Sikandar er stolt af at blive portrætteret som Hamas terrorist (frihedskæmper i hans bog). Meget kan man sige om terrorsympatisørerne, men de står i det mindste ved det. De ved at det har noget nær nul konsekvenser og ikke afskrækker medier fra at interviewe dem eller trykke… https://t.co/Tz5M52aA7W
— Jotam Confino (@mrconfino) September 27, 2024
IMPLICATIONS OF PROFESSIONAL AVOIDANCE
Confino’s strategy not only undermines the essence of journalism but also brilliantly showcases how to erode public trust and credibility. By silencing critics, particularly those like Niels who dare to question, Confino ensures that the narrative remains uncontested—well, because there’s no one left to contest it.
EXPERT? MORE LIKE EXPERT AT EVADE
Jotam Confino might not win any awards for diplomacy, but his tactics in evading criticism are certainly noteworthy. Aspiring journalists, note this is how you ensure your career is as short-lived as your critics’ comments in your feed.
In journalism, where the free exchange of ideas and accountability are cornerstones, Confino’s approach might just set a new standard — for what not to do. Remember, the next time you claim to be an expert, ensure your expertise extends beyond blocking those who disagree.
This satirical look aims to underline the contradictions in claiming professional status while actively undermining the foundational values of journalism.
LIST OF PEOPLE AND INCIDENTS REFLECTING JOTAM CONFINO’S TEMPERAMENT
I just saw indescribable, raw footage of Hamas’ massacre along with 100 other international journalists, provided by Israeli authorities. Here are the notes I took:
— Jotam Confino (@mrconfino) October 23, 2023
1: Hamas terrorist screaming Allah Akhbah as he frantically tries to behead a dead man with a shovel.
CONCERNS REGARDING FUJ NOMINEE AND POTENTIAL EXTERNAL INFLUENCE
A LETTER TO FUJ, FORENINGEN FOR UNDERSØGENDE JOURNALISTIK
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding a recent discovery that profoundly alarmed me.
READ MORE: A LETTER TO FUJ
…As someone who strongly supports the mission of Foreningen for Undersøgende Journalistik (FUJ) to promote investigative journalism in Danish media, I am deeply concerned by recent developments I have encountered.
Today, I came across a post on Jotam Confino’s Instagram profile, where he announced being nominated for the aktualitetsprisen alongside his colleagues Claes Theilgaard and Albert Beenfeldt for their coverage of Enhedslisten’s alleged terror connections. While I respect FUJ’s work, it is troubling to see that one of the nominees, Claes Theilgaard, is a student who only began his studies in 2022 at Aalborg University in Copenhagen.
What raises even more concern is that this student was invited by the Israeli Embassy just a year into his studies. This suggests an alarming level of external influence for someone still in training.
Questions about political bias and objectivity
The issue is not only that a student with limited experience is receiving significant recognition, but also the implications of his association with a foreign embassy. How can an aspiring journalist, still learning the craft, be exposed to such a strong and potentially biased influence without raising concerns about the integrity of investigative journalism?
FUJ’s mission has always been to foster independent investigative journalism. This situation appears to contradict those principles. It is challenging to reconcile how a student could quickly gain such prominence through external connections, especially with a controversial entity like the Israeli Embassy.
This raises serious concerns about the objectivity and independence of the journalism being celebrated under FUJ’s auspices, potentially setting a troubling precedent. Investigative journalism must remain a discipline of rigor and balance, free from external bias, especially for young journalists in their formative years.
Upholding integrity and journalistic standards
FUJ has always been a leader in fostering true investigative journalism across print, radio, and television, supporting professionals at all levels. However, these developments challenge the core values of FUJ’s mission.
The nomination of Claes Theilgaard and the apparent influence surrounding it risk undermining the principles of unbiased journalism that FUJ strives to promote.
I am writing as an observer and someone deeply invested in the future of investigative journalism in Denmark.
How does FUJ plan to address this situation and ensure the integrity and independence of Danish journalism moving forward?
Thank you for considering this issue. I look forward to your response.
Kind regards,
Zahid Latif
Freelance Journalist (Hobby Basis)
CLAES KIRKEBY THEILGAARD

FROM CLASSROOM TO CONSPIRACIES
THE ‘EXPERT’ WHO CAN’T TAKE CRITICISM
MY OBSERVATIONS ON JOTAM CONFINO’S RESPONSE AND CONCERNS ABOUT HIS OBJECTIVITY
Recently, I’ve been closely following the work of Jotam Confino, a journalist who contributes to outlets like B.T. and several international media. During my research, I noticed a clear pattern in Confino’s coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict, which seemed consistently one-sided, often favouring the Israeli perspective. Given my observations, I asked him straightforward questions, hoping for an open discussion about whether he acknowledges any bias in his reporting.
READ MORE: A HISTORY OF REACTING WITH ANGER
A HISTORY OF REACTING WITH ANGER
To my surprise, instead of engaging constructively, Confino responded with hostility. His reaction was dismissive and defensive, reflecting the combative nature that others have also observed in his professional dealings. This aligns with reports of his strong temperament, influenced by his father’s upbringing. Confino himself admits that his father’s advice—“If someone hits you, hit back harder”—has deeply shaped his aggressive approach to handling criticism, whether on social media or in his professional life.
This personal experience left me questioning his ability to handle valid criticisms, particularly given his ongoing defamation lawsuit against former Enhedslisten politician Asmaa Abdol-Hamid.
LAWSUIT AND CHARACTER ASSASSINATION CLAIMS
The lawsuit, as reported, centers around Abdol-Hamid’s criticism of Confino’s coverage. In one Facebook post dated December 27, 2023, she questioned his journalistic neutrality, asking:
“Is Confino an influence agent for the occupation and apartheid state of Israel? Whether it’s Confino or a representative from the Israel Occupation Force appearing on TV 2, the content delivered is essentially the same—potato, potato.”
Confino has labelled this as character assassination, but his reaction mirrors his pattern of lashing out when feeling attacked, a trait he developed early on. His aggressive responses to critics, especially on social media, have become a defining feature of his public persona.
QUESTIONS ABOUT OBJECTIVITY AND CONNECTIONS TO ISRAEL
What deepened my concern about Confino’s objectivity is his visible closeness to Israeli political figures like Benjamin Netanyahu, as seen on his social media profiles. Given his father’s history as an Israeli soldier and the father’s direct influence on Jotam’s combative nature, one wonders how this has shaped Confino’s journalistic independence. Can a journalist reporting on one of the most polarizing conflicts in the world remain objective when they seem personally tied to one side?
His portrayal of events often aligns with the Israeli narrative, raising valid questions about bias. Confino’s hostile reaction to criticism only amplifies these concerns about his capacity for impartial reporting.
THE INVITATION TO CLAES THEILGAARD AND POLITICAL INFLUENCE
My unease extends beyond Confino. It’s concerning that the Israeli embassy invited Claes Theilgaard, a student who had only been studying for a year at Aalborg University. This raises questions about whether such early exposure to significant political influence is appropriate for someone so early in their journalistic career. Why was he chosen for such a politically sensitive invitation? It only fuels the concern about how foreign entities may shape perspectives before these young journalists mature.
CONCERNS ABOUT FUJ AND NOMINATIONS FOR THE AKTUALITETSPRISEN 2024
These questions come to a head when examining how Jotam Confino and Claes Theilgaard were selected as nominees for the Aktualitetsprisen 2024, awarded by Foreningen for Undersøgende Journalistik (FUJ). FUJ’s mission is to promote unbiased and thorough investigative journalism, but how can they uphold these values when such clear connections and potential biases are involved?
A CALL FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IN INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM
This entire situation raises uncomfortable questions about investigative journalism’s state and the standards institutions like FUJ uphold. If the integrity of the candidates themselves is questionable, how can we trust the work they produce, let alone celebrate it as deserving of an award? Jotam Confino’s strong personal biases, amplified by his upbringing and professional conduct, call into question his ability to uphold the ethical standards necessary for good journalism.
As readers, we must demand accountability and transparency, especially from those who claim the title of ‘expert.’ If journalists cannot handle scrutiny or criticism, how can we rely on them to deliver unbiased and fair reporting on the most critical issues of our time?
Jeg vil gætte på det ikke er Hamas forsøg på folkedrab der skal diskuteres på årsdagen for 7 oktober massakren. Spændende hvor mange andre usmagelige arrangementer der skal afholdes den ene dag på året hvor verden bør give vise bare en smule sympati og forståelse for ofrene for… pic.twitter.com/7s3Xd8vUPo
— Jotam Confino (@mrconfino) September 25, 2024
So many more scenes but I hope you get the gist. The authorities asked is not to film the screening out of respect for the relatives of the Israeli victims. If anyone has any doubt about what happened, I truly don’t know what to say anymore.
— Jotam Confino (@mrconfino) October 23, 2023
THANKS, DAD! HOW JOTAM CONFINO LEARNED THE ART OF NEVER BACKING DOWN—ESPECIALLY ONLINE
Der bliver spredt voldsomt meget misinformation på sociale medier om Israels krigsførelse, både af terrorsympatisører men også NGOer, politikere, og selverklærede krigseksperter.
— Jotam Confino (@mrconfino) September 27, 2024
I modsætning til dem, så er Kenneth Buhl militæranalytiker ved Institut for Strategi og… pic.twitter.com/99gwuPVsF5
Dagens artikel som @PerClausen3 og Co skal forsøge at benægte, lyve om eller bortforklare med “kampagnejournalistik”:
— Jotam Confino (@mrconfino) September 27, 2024
Terrorsympatien er så udbredt i Enhedslisten, at det ikke blot er på sociale medier eller til private arrangementer at de taler om hvor fantastiske de… pic.twitter.com/ekNuMqRMmc
WHEN IN DOUBT, FIGHT: JOTAM CONFINO’S DAD KNOWS BEST—AND SO DOES HE
I just saw indescribable, raw footage of Hamas’ massacre along with 100 other international journalists, provided by Israeli authorities. Here are the notes I took:
— Jotam Confino (@mrconfino) October 23, 2023
1: Hamas terrorist screaming Allah Akhbah as he frantically tries to behead a dead man with a shovel.
TERRORSTATE ISRAEL PROPAGANDA
AN INVESTIGATION INTO BIAS AND INFLUENCE
The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine has long been a point of global controversy, with many questioning the media’s portrayal of events. Among the journalists who have faced criticism is Jotam Confino, whose coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict has been accused of showing a clear pro-Israel bias. Asmaa Abdol-Hamid, a former politician from Enhedslisten, has openly questioned Jotam Confino’s bias, calling out what she perceives as pro-Israel propaganda in his reporting.
In one of her public posts, Abdol-Hamid asked a critical question: “Is Confino an influence agent for the occupation and apartheid state of Israel?” Her bold statement raises legitimate concerns about Jotam Confino’s bias and whether his reporting can be trusted as objective journalism, or if it is influenced by a pro-Israel agenda.
PROPAGANDA AND MEDIA BIAS
The influence of the Israel lobby is a well-documented phenomenon. Articles like Is the Israel Lobby for Real? explore how powerful lobbying groups work to shape narratives in favor of Israel, often downplaying or justifying the occupation of Palestine. The question of media bias becomes especially concerning when the journalists reporting on the conflict are potentially aligned with such influential entities.
Confino’s alleged bias is further complicated by his public associations and the perception that he may be sympathetic to the Israeli government. His involvement in pro-Israel narratives is not an isolated case. The Israeli state has been accused of waging an information war, attempting to manipulate the global narrative in its favor. The Information War and Hamas Charter examines this tactic, revealing how Israel seeks to label Palestinian resistance movements as inherently terroristic, while downplaying its own actions.
THIS IS HOW PROPAGANDA WORKS
Propaganda efforts by the Israeli state are not a secret. In fact, there are clear guidelines on how the narrative should be shaped to the global audience. One stark example of this is the Israel Project’s 2009 Global Language Dictionary, a document that outlines strategies to frame Israel’s actions in a favorable light. You can view the document here. The language guide demonstrates how carefully crafted messaging is used to manipulate international perceptions of the Israel-Palestine conflict, ensuring that Israel is portrayed as a victim and Palestinians as aggressors.
VOICES OF RESISTANCE AND CENSORSHIP
The case of Israeli soldiers who have refused to participate in military actions against Gaza, such as this powerful story, shows a stark contrast to the pro-Israel narratives often seen in mainstream media. These voices of dissent are frequently sidelined, further perpetuating pro-Israel bias in global coverage.
It becomes vital to ask: how much of this is carefully crafted propaganda? And if this is the case, should journalists like Jotam Confino be held accountable for reinforcing these narratives, either intentionally or through biased reporting?
BOYCOTT AND RESISTANCE AGAINST ISRAELI PROPAGANDA
Movements like the Boycott Israel campaign work to bring awareness to the oppression of Palestinians by encouraging economic and cultural resistance. This article delves deeper into the goals of the boycott, aiming to disrupt the flow of support that sustains the occupation. The goal is not just to raise awareness but to challenge the powerful mechanisms, including media influence, that keep the occupation in place.
It is disheartening to see young, inexperienced journalists being exposed to these one-sided narratives so early in their careers. The case of Claes Theilgaard, a student invited by the Israeli embassy after just one year of studies, raises serious questions about how these invitations are used to create early alliances and influence the media landscape.
A CALL FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
If Jotam Confino and other journalists are contributing to the propaganda machine of the Israeli state, it’s imperative that the journalistic community addresses this. Organizations like the Foreningen for Undersøgende Journalistik (FUJ), which has nominated Confino for a prize, should reassess whether such a candidate aligns with their values of promoting objective, unbiased investigative journalism.
As Asmaa Abdol-Hamid continues to speak out, the responsibility falls on all of us to critically evaluate the information we consume and to demand accountability from those who shape our understanding of global events.