No Shipment to Israel

HVAD ER EN ZIONIST

Af i Cultur Clash, Geopolitics, Islamofobia, Religion, Report

HVAD ER EN ZIONIST OG ZIONISME

stadig under opbygning

Lies by the Zionists, Israelians. 

SKREVET AF: ANNA ASKJÆR LARSEN 18/12/2024

BALDWIN OM ZIONISMEN OG PALÆSTINA

James Baldwin den kendte sorte amerikanske forfatter der var en vigtig stemme under kampen for sortes rettighed og nær ven af både Martin Luther King og Malcolm X mfl var ekstremt klarsynet ifht zionismen og Palæstina fra starten – men nu var Baldwin ekstremt klarsynet om det meste så det bør ikke undre.
Nedenstående et uddrag fra hans sidste roman skrevet i 1978 hvor han reflekterer over terrorisme – han var uden tvivl blevet sigtet for at billige terror i dagens Danmark:
“I was traveling before the days of electronic surveillance, before the hijackers and terrorists arrived. For the arrival of these people, the people in the seats of power have only themselves to blame. Who, indeed, has hijacked more than England has, for example, or who is more skilled in the uses of terror than my own unhappy country?
Yes, I know: nevertheless, children, what goes around comes around, what you send out comes back to you. A terrorist is called that only because he does not have the power of the State behind him–indeed, he has no State, which is why he is a terrorist. The State, at bottom, and when the chips are down, rules by means of a terror made legal–that is how Franco ruled so long, and is the undeniable truth concerning South Africa.
No one called the late J. Edgar Hoover a terrorist, though that is precisely what he was: and if anyone wishes, now, in this context, to speak of “civilized” values or “democracy” or “morality,” you will pardon this poor nigger if he puts his hand before his mouth, and snickers–if he laughs at you.
I have endured your morality for a very long time, am still crawling up out of that dungheap: all that the slave can learn from his master is how to be a slave, and that is not morality.”
I hans essay fra 1972 “Take Me to the Water,” genfortæller Baldwin om hvorfor han ikke drog til Israel da han flyttede fra USA:
“And if I had fled, to Israel, a state created for the purpose of protecting Western interests, I would have been in a yet tighter bind: on which side of Jerusalem would I have decided to live?”
Allerede i 1948 forstod Baldwin tingene mere klart end selv visse dele af den såkaldte venstrefløj idag gør.
Baldwins mest direkte kritik af Israel kom i dette brev skrevet efter at den amerikansk ambassadør til FN Andrew Young blev fyret af Jimmy Carter fordi han havde besluttet at holde et møde med en delegation fra PLO I 1979:
“Jews and Palestinians know of broken promises. From the time of the Balfour Declaration (during World War I) Palestine was under five British mandates, and England promised the land back and forth to the Arabs or the Jews, depending on which horse seemed to be in the lead. The Zionists–as distinguished from the people known as the Jews–using, as someone put it, the “available political machinery,” i.e., colonialism, e.g., the British Empire–promised the British that, if the territory were given to them, the British Empire would be safe forever.
But absolutely no one cared about the Jews, and it is worth observing that non-Jewish Zionists are very frequently anti-Semitic.”
“But the state of Israel was not created for the salvation of the Jews; it was created for the salvation of Western interests. This is what is becoming clear (I must say it was always clear to me). The Palestinians have been paying for the British colonial policy of “divide and rule” and for Europe’s guilty Christian conscience for more than thirty years…The collapse of the Shah not only revealed the depth of pious Carter’s concern for “human rights,” it also revealed who supplied oil to Israel, and to whom Israel supplied arms. It happened to be, to spell it out, white South Africa.”
Jeg kan også varmt anbefale dokumentaren om Baldwin fra 2016 “I am not your Negro”

FACEBOOK

WHAT IS A ZIONIST?

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

A Zionist supports the creation and maintenance of a Jewish state, primarily Israel, but the term has become a lightning rod for both legitimate debate and hateful rhetoric. Zionism started in the 19th century as a response to Jewish persecution, yet today, it’s often twisted into a symbol of oppression by those who choose to see only the political complexities without understanding its roots.

In articles like “Denmark Islamophobia: The Untold Story”, Jaleh Tavakoli is showcased as promoting ugly, racist rhetoric, demonstrating how fear and ignorance fuel hate. This pattern is echoed in critiques of racist speeches against Muslims and the rise of hate speech globally.

Ultimately, people like Tavakoli simplify complex political realities into hate-driven diatribes. And really, who needs nuanced debate when you can just shout louder and claim to know better?

Zionist Extremism: A Threat to Palestinian Existence?

While Zionism originally sought a safe homeland for Jews, its extreme forms have sparked controversy, particularly regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Zionist extremism, which pushes for exclusive Jewish control over all historic Palestine, has led to policies that many argue are a direct threat to the existence and rights of Palestinians. Settlement expansions, displacement, and military control in the West Bank and Gaza Strip are seen as erasing Palestinian claims to land and sovereignty, leaving many Palestinians without basic rights or homes.

For Palestinians, this form of Zionism represents more than a political movement—it threatens their very existence, culture, and future in the region.

EXAMPLES OF ZIONISTS